.violence Vs Non Violence Read Count : 90

Category : Blogs

Sub Category : Self Help

Is it violence the right path to maintain peace. Or another cause which create violence ?. Well In my point of view Violence too response to create another situation of violence. 

The peaceful path might be maintained by the peaceful way. 

The great ruler of Ashoka too adopted 

the strategy of aggression to expand his empire in the earlier period of empire. But When he saw the consequences of his strategy he decided to change his policy of aggression and he was accepted the path of non violence because he had aware the consequences of violence. He knew that many innocent people lost their life during war. He felt guilty to knew  this fact that he was responsible for all death of innocent people. So he decided. He would left the policy of violence. After that he became a famous ruler of India history. So my point is we can never get peace through the way of violence. It would only create aggressive nothing else but it's doesn't mean if someone attack on you. You still follow the police of non violence. As 

Stated that the person who tolerated violence as  same he responsible who created violence. 

Comments

  • No Comments
Log Out?

Are you sure you want to log out?